Conflicting Perspective on GenAI in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study of Student Use and Marker Responses in an ODeL Context
Abstract
e surge of GenAI in higher education has sparked mixed reactions among students, markers, and scholars. Guided by Moore’s Transactional Distance Theory, this qualitative case study investigates conflicting perceptions of GenAI use in an ODeL context, where limited dialogue and increased transactional distance hinder effective communication. Data were collected through open-ended online questionnaires from students and structured evaluation forms from markers. Results show that students use GenAI to improve grammar, vocabulary, idea generation, and structural quality, which promotes cognitive development and helps overcome writer’s block and low confidence. However, students fear being stigmatised by markers and often self-censor due to unclear institutional policies. Markers, on the other hand, question the authenticity and depth of GenAI-incorporated content, viewing it as generic and lacking critical engagement. This leads to biased assessments, ethical dilemmas, and strained student–marker relationships, worsened by unreliable GenAI detection tools and the absence of institutional guidelines. The study concludes that GenAI’s influence on transactional distance depends on institutional readiness to integrate and regulate its use responsibly. Therefore, institutions should develop transparent GenAI policies, provide literacy training, and promote open dialogue to ensure fair assessment, reduce bias, and reframe GenAI as a transformative pedagogical tool rather than a threat.
Downloads
References
Abubaker, N. M. N., Kashani, S., Alshalwy, A. M., & Garib, A. (2025). Reshaping higher education in MENA with generative AI: A systematic review. In Emerging technologies transforming higher education: Instructional design and student success (pp. 231–256). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/reshaping-higher-education-in-mena-with-generative-ai/358223
Akkaş, Ö. M., Tosun, C., & Gökçearslan, Ş. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) and cheating: The concept of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). In Transforming education with generative AI: Prompt engineering and synthetic content creation (pp. 182–199). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://irma-international.org/chapter/artificial-intelligence-cheating/338537/
Aldreabi, H., Dahdoul, N. K. S., Alhur, M., Alzboun, N., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2025). Determinants of student adoption of generative AI in higher education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 23(1), 15–33. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/3599
Alimardani, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence vs. law students: An empirical study on criminal law exam performance. Law, Innovation and Technology, 16(2), 777–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2024.2392932
AlSagri, H. S., Farhat, F., Sohail, S. S., & Saudagar, A. K. J. (2024). ChatGPT or Gemini: Who makes the better scientific writing assistant? Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09549-0
Alshahrani, S., & Ward, M. (2023). Attitudes towards generative AI among undergraduate students: A study on AI acceptance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11679-5
An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
Ardito, C. G. (2024). Generative AI detection in higher education assessments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20624
Aslanyan-Rad, E. (2024). The role of ChatGPT in academic learning of higher education: A comprehensive systematic review and analysis of the literature. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Erfan-Aslanyan-Rad/publication/385708225
Bagdi, H., Bulsara, H. P., Sankar, D., & Sharma, L. (2023). The transition from traditional to digital: Factors that propel Generation Z’s adoption of online learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(3), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2023-0003
Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/4/296
Blonder, R., & Feldman-Maggor, Y. (2024). AI for chemistry teaching: Responsible AI and ethical considerations. Chemistry Teacher International, 6(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2024-0014
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., … Asino, T. I. (Eds.). (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.16.4.1779
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Carrigan, M. (2024). Generative AI for academics. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Chakraborty, S. (2024). Generative AI in modern education society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08666. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08666
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT)-based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4
Cohen, A. D., & Henry, A. (2019). Focus on the language learner: Styles, strategies and motivation. In An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 165–189). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424465-10
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In Research methods in education (pp. 440–456). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Combrinck, C., & Loubser, N. (2025). Student self-reflection as a tool for managing GenAI use in large class assessment. Discover Education, 4(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00461-2
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating? Exploring the use of ChatGPT in student assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2213475
Daher, W., & Hussein, A. (2024). Higher education students’ perceptions of GenAI tools for learning. Information, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15070416
Deb, I., Bayen, L., & Sharma, J. (2025). Empowering students through digital literacy: Transformation of education in the modern era. In Role of digital education in transforming higher education in India (p. 112). Kunal Books.
Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive generative pre-trained transformers: Artificial intelligence vs. academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-8
De La Osa, D. U. S., & Remolina, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence at the bench: Legal and ethical challenges of informing—or misinforming—judicial decision-making through generative AI. Data & Policy, 6, e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.53
Delamont, S. (2016). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives. Routledge.
Dilzhan, B. (2024). Teaching English and artificial intelligence: EFL teachers’ perceptions and use of ChatGPT (Dissertation, SDU University). https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fwy92
Duah, J. E., & McGivern, P. (2024). How generative artificial intelligence has blurred notions of authorial identity and academic norms in higher education, necessitating clear university usage policies. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2023-0213
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Eaton, S. E. (2021). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-8
Ferrara, E. (2024). GenAI against humanity: Nefarious applications of generative artificial intelligence and large language models. Journal of Computational Social Science, 7(1), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00250-1
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Fynn, A. (2021). Unisa’s international students profiled. Directorate Institutional Research. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/myunisa/default/News/Articles/Unisas-international-students-profiled
Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., … Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886
Gonsalves, C. (2025). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: Implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654
Hanafi, A. M., Al-Mansi, M. M., & Al-Sharif, O. A. (2025). Generative AI in academia: A comprehensive review of applications and implications for the research process. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences-October 6 University, 2(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijeasou.2025.349520.1041
Hoernig, S., Ilharco, A., Pereira, P. T., & Pereira, R. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Institute of Public Policy.
Huang, K., Wang, Y., Goertzel, B., Li, Y., Wright, S., & Ponnapalli, J. (2024). Generative AI security. Springer.
Iqbal, J., Hashmi, Z. F., Asghar, M. Z., & Abid, M. N. (2025). Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 16610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x
Khasawneh, O. Y. (2023). Technophobia: How students’ technophobia impacts their technology acceptance in an online class. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2714–2723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2168987
Kizito, R. (2023). Rethinking digital equity and academic support in the GenAI era. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(6), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-6-5697
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2023). Learner autonomy and AI integration in ODeL contexts. Information and Learning Sciences, 125(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160
Krause, S., Panchal, B. H., & Ubhe, N. (2025). Evolution of learning: Assessing the transformative impact of generative AI on higher education. Frontiers of Digital Education, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-025-0058-7
Lai, C., & Sundqvist, P. (2025). Research agenda: Synergizing in-class and out-of-class language learning with technology. Language Teaching, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482500014X
Laine, J., Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2025). Understanding the ethics of generative AI: Established and new ethical principles. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 56(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05601
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
Mahmoud, A. B., Kumar, V., & Spyropoulou, S. (2025). Identifying the public's beliefs about generative artificial intelligence: A big data approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 72, 827-841. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2025.3534088
Maphoto, K. (2022). First-year students at an open distance and e-learning institution: Perceptions, expectations, and challenges associated with academic writing feedback. Journal for Language Teaching, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.56285/jltVol56iss1a5413
Maphoto, K., & Sevnarayan, K. (2021). Reimagining feedback for improved academic writing in distance education: Lecturers and markers’ perspectives in South Africa. Journal for Language Teaching, 55(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.56285/jltVol55iss2a5413
Mertler, C. A. (2024). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Meyer, M., & Mayrhofer, W. (2022). Selecting a sample. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (2nd ed., pp. 273–289). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278
Moore, M. G. (1972). Transactional distance. Journal of Communication, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00136.x
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
Naqvi, W. M., Ganjoo, R., Rowe, M., Pashine, A. A., & Mishra, G. V. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Implications for health sciences education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1571527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1571527
Namoun, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Mustafa, E., Alrehaili, A., Tufail, A., Shuja, J., … Alanazi, M. H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education: An umbrella review of applications and challenges.
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643
Nkadimeng, M., & Jantjies, M. (2024). Digital inequality and student confidence in generative AI use in South African universities. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
Nyaaba, M., Wright, A., & Choi, G. L. (2024). Generative AI and digital neocolonialism in global education: Towards an equitable framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02966. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02966
Park, E. (2023). Ethical issues of generative AI in academic writing: A case study of student responses. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09622-4
Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2025). Collaborative uses of GenAI tools in project-based learning. Education Sciences, 15(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030354
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024a). Detection of GPT-4 generated text in higher education: Combining academic judgement and software to identify generative AI tool misuse. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Vu, B. H., Postma, D., Hickerson, D., McGaughran, J., … Chandrasegaran, S. (2024b). A qualitative study of university staff perceptions of the risks and benefits of generative AI tools in teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2164021
Picard, C., Edwards, K. M., Doris, A. C., Man, B., Giannone, G., Alam, M. F., & Ahmed, F. (2025). From concept to manufacturing: Evaluating vision-language models for engineering design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(9), 288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11290-y
Prinsloo, P., Slade, S., & Khalil, M. (2023). At the intersection of human and algorithmic decision-making in distributed learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2121343
Qi, J., Liu, J. A., & Xu, Y. (2025). The role of individual capabilities in maximizing the benefits for students using GenAI tools in higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030328
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., Kareem, A., & Mobeen, S. (2023). Amplifying classroom enjoyment and cultivating positive learning attitudes among ESL learners. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 2236–2246. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1102.0522
Razi, A., Bouzoubaa, L., Pessianzadeh, A., Seberger, J. S., & Rezapour, R. (2024). Not a Swiss Army knife: Academics’ perceptions of trade-offs around generative artificial intelligence use. arXiv preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00995
Ricci, L., Lanfranchi, J. B., Lemetayer, F., Rotonda, C., Guillemin, F., Coste, J., & Spitz, E. (2019). Qualitative methods used to generate questionnaire items: A systematic review. Qualitative Health Research, 29(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318783186
Selwyn, N. (2024). AI and the future of education: Reflections on generative AI and schooling. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2134567
Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Making sense of the digital automation of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00362-9
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? John Wiley & Sons.
Simkute, A., Kewenig, V., Sellen, A., Rintel, S., & Tankelevitch, L. (2025). The new calculator? Practices, norms, and implications of generative AI in higher education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08864. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08864
Singh, R. K., Kushwaha, B. P., Chadha, T., & Singh, V. A. (2021). Influence of digital media marketing and celebrity endorsement on consumer purchase intention. Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 14(7), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.21/12
Taguchi, N., & Zhao, S. (2025). Can virtual reality leverage technology-mediated task-based language teaching? A research synthesis. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 2(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2024-0028
Tang, J., Yang, Y., Wei, W., Shi, L., Su, L., Cheng, S., … Huang, C. (2024). GraphGPT: Graph instruction tuning for large language models. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 491–500). https://doi.org/10.1145/3626772.3657775
University of South Africa. (2019). Assessment policy. https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/myunisa/Content/Student%20affairs%20%26%20SRC/Documents/SRC%20Important%20Policy%20Documents/Assessment%20Policy%20-%20rev%20appr%20Council%20-%2019.06.2019.pdf
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
Yan, Z., Yu, Y., Du, K., & Zhang, N. (2024). How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China’s total emission control policy. Ecological Economics, 219, 108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108137
Yusuf, A. A., Kesselly, H. F., Nippae, A., Asumana, C., Kakulu, M. O., Sinneh, I. S., … Mayango, R. B. (2024). A comprehensive review of Liberia's energy scenario: Advancing energy access, sustainability, and policy implications. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51, 101295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101295
Zlotnikova, I., Hlomani, H., Mokgetse, T., & Bagai, K. (2025). Establishing ethical standards for GenAI in university education: A roadmap for academic integrity and fairness. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2024-0104
Copyright (c) 2026 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
