Exploring the Challenges Experienced During the Work-integrated Learning of Economic and Management Sciences Student Teachers at a Rural University: A Relational Leadership Approach

  • Habasisa Vincent Molise Department of Education Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Limpopo, South Africa
  • Mapule Yvonne Segooa Department of Education Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Limpopo, South Africa
Keywords: Rurality, Mentorship, Mentor-teachers, Relational leadership, Teaching practice, Work integrated learning

Abstract

Work-integrated learning is the time when student-teachers visit schools to practice their teaching skills. Participation in teaching activities allows student-teachers to apply the theories and principles they learn in lectures. WIL begins at university, when their lecturers supervise student-teachers as they learn about various educational ideas and practices. The study investigates the challenges that economic and management sciences student-teachers face during their WIL, such as a lack of intensive student mentoring, a lack of cordial relationships between student-teachers and mentor-teachers, a lack of clearly defined student expectations, and a lack of commitment from student-teachers and mentor-teachers. A total of five participants were carefully chosen to participate in the study. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data and gain a thorough understanding. The data was analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings highlighted the necessity of developing partnerships between university and school stakeholders to facilitate the efficient implementation of EMS student-teachers' WILs. University teachers just visit pupils from schools to evaluate them, with little support provided. The mentor instructors also leave student-teachers alone in their classrooms without offering mentorship, viewing the students' presence at school as an opportunity to be free of teaching. The study suggests that the WIL of EMS student-teachers be framed as an archetype within the relational leadership approach to help promote cordial relationships among all involved for it to be successfully implemented and effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprile, K. T., & Knight, B. A. (2020). The WIL to learn: Students’ perspectives on the impact of work-integrated learning placements on their professional readiness. Higher Education Research & Development, 9(5), 869–882.

Berndtsson, I., Dahlborg, E., & Pennbrant, S. (2020). Work-integrated learning as a pedagogical tool to integrate theory and practice in nursing education: an integrative literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 42, 1–8.

Bidandi, F., Anthony, A. N., & Mukong, C. (2022). Collaboration and partnerships between South African higher education institutions and stakeholders: a case study of a post-apartheid university. Discover Education, 1(1), 2.

Bouwer, M., Venketsamy, R., & Bipath, K. (2021). Remodeling work-integrated learning experiences of grade R student teachers. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 16–33. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-4-4331

Branson, C. M., & Marra, M. (2019). Leadership as a relational phenomenon: what this means in practice. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 4(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2019.1.4

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10, 807-815.

Dean, B. A. (2023). The value of work-integrated learning for preparing the future teaching workforce. In M. Winslade, T. Loughland, & M. J. Eady (Eds.), Work-integrated learning case studies in teacher education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6532-6_2

Deo, S., & Shuchita, J. S. (2023). Building strong connections: The potential of relational leadership to empower early childhood educators as leaders. He Kupu The World, 7(4), 1–10.

Govender, D., Prakaschandra, D. R., & Mohapi, M. J. (2021). Student preparedness for work-integrated learning in biomedical technology: Student perspective. The Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology of South Africa, 3(2), 65–71.

Jita, T., & Akintunde, M. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions towards the use of ICTs during work-integrated learning (WIL). In E. Langran, & L. Archambault (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1441–1446). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Khampirat, B. (2021). The impact of work-integrated learning and learning strategies on engineering students’ learning outcomes in Thailand: A multiple mediation model of learning experiences and psychological factors. IEEE Access, 9, 111390-111406.

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Lee, Y., Douglass, A., Zeng, S., Lopes, A. W., & Reyes, A. (2022). Preparing early educators as frontline leaders and change agents with a leadership development initiative. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-022-00095-z

Lemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: Using Leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 604-614.

Mabalane, V. T. (2022). Work-integrated learning online enrichment intervention program for student teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p59

Maritsa, E., Goula, A., Psychogios, A., & Pierrakos, G. (2022). Leadership development: Exploring relational leadership implications in healthcare organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315971

Marlow, A., Saunders, C., & Mather, C. (2021). Evaluating work-integrated learning. In Advances in Research, Theory, and Practice in Work-Integrated Learning (pp. 121–130), Routledge.

Matsoso, M. L., & Benedict, O. H. (2020). Work-integrated learning: a powerful connecting tool between classroom and industry. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 11(1), 94–112.

Mesuwini, J., Thaba-Nkadimene, K. L., Mzindle, D., & Mokoena, S. (2023). Work-integrated learning experiences of South African technical and vocational education and training lecturers. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(1), 83–97.

Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes, and procedures: A theoretical overview. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 14–20.

Nicholson, J., & Kurucz, E. (2019). Relational leadership for sustainability: building an ethical framework from the moral theory of "ethics of care". Journal of Business Ethics, 156(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3593-4

Nicola-Richmond, K., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2022). Students’ feedback on literacy in workplace integrated learning: how prepared are they?. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–11.

Nigate, D. A., Mihiretie, D. M., & Kassa, S. A. (2023). Mentoring during school practicum: Mentor-mentee relationship, roles assumed, and focus of feedback. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(4), 491–503.

Nila, B. J., & Joseph J. R. (2023). Relational leadership: Reconceptualizing how school districts address teacher attrition. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 8(3), 1-31.

Ntakumba, S. S., & De Jongh, D. (2023). RSCL onto-epistemology and practice approach to reconceptualizing responsible leadership theory. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1

Pace, D. S. (2021). Probability and non-probability sampling are entry points for undergraduate researchers. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 9(2), 1–15.

Ramlani, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm in education. The Journal of Inventions Pedagogical and Practices, 1, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.58977/jipp. v1i3.12

Ramsaroop, S., Petersen, N., & Gravett, S. (2020). Work-integrated learning and teaching in schools: The University of Johannesburg teaching school experience. In J. De Beer, N. Petersen, & H. J. Van Vuuren (Eds.), Becoming a teacher: Research on the work-integrated learning of student teachers. (NWU) Self-Directed Learning Series, (pp. 89–114). AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2020.BK215.04

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research and Methods in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22–29.

Rusznyak, L., & Bertram, C. (2021). Conceptualizing work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers’ pedagogic reasoning. Journal of Education, 83, 34–52. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i83a02

Samuel, T. (2022). Why every student should have a mentor. Getenpoint https://www.getenpoint.com/post/why-every-student-should-have-a-mentor

Schoch, K. (2020). Case study research. In G. J. Burkholder, K. A. Cox., L. M. Crawford, & J. H. Hitchcock (Eds.), Research design and methods: an applied guide for the scholar-practitioner (pp. 245-258). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Suri, H. (2020). Ethical considerations when conducting systematic reviews in educational research systematic reviews in educational research. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_3

Thi Ngoc Ha, N. (2023). Implementation of on-campus work-integrated learning activities in Vietnamese universities: Don’t rely on lecturers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(8), 1124–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2217648

Tutz, G. (2023). Probability and non-probability samples: Improving regression modeling by using data from different sources. Information Sciences, 621, 424–436.

Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.

Wang, Y., Su, Q., & Sun, W. (2022). CEO relational leadership and product innovation performance: the roles of TMT behavior and characteristics. Frontier Psychology, 13, 874105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874105

Wargo, E., Budge, K., Carr-Chellman, D., & Canfield-Davis, K. (2021). Leadership for rural school district improvement: the case of one statewide research practice partnership. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 37(1).

Whitehead, D., & Whitehead, L. (2020). Data collection and sampling are important in qualitative research. In D. Whitehead, C. Ferguson, G. Lobiondo-Wood, & J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing and midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice (6th ed.) (pp.118-135). Elsevier Australia.

Winborg, J., & Hägg, G. (2023). The role of work-integrated learning in preparing students for a corporate entrepreneurial career. Education and Training, 65(4), 674-696. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2021-0196

Published
2024-08-31
How to Cite
Molise, H. V., & Segooa, M. Y. (2024). Exploring the Challenges Experienced During the Work-integrated Learning of Economic and Management Sciences Student Teachers at a Rural University: A Relational Leadership Approach. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 466-482. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i2.403
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 678 times
PDF downloaded = 422 times