All-in-One E-Book Development in Proposing Automatic Critical Thinking Skill Assessments
Abstract
Many e-books have been developed to learn specific physics concepts with comprehensive features. This means that e-books not only contain the primary components such as animations, videos, and illustrations but also many of them are equipped with virtual experiments. However, these e-books often need more integration of the assessment process, which is an important part of the learning experience. To address this, an all-in-one e-book concept called Aneboo has been developed. Aneboo includes interactive physics illustrations, virtual laboratories, worksheets, videos, and critical thinking assessments, all built into a single media platform for learning the concept of static fluids in junior high school. Additionally, Aneboo examines its function in automatically assessing critical thinking skills. The development of Aneboo follows the Hannafin & Peck development model, which includes needs assessment, design and development, implementation, and identification of similarities between manual and automatic scoring. As a result, Aneboo has achieved a validation score ranging from 95% to 97%. Moreover, Aneboo has the potential to automatically assess critical thinking skills through the similarity check feature embedded in the media.
Downloads
References
Adam, A. S., & Suprapto, N. (2019). One-stop physics e-book package development for senior high school learning media. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(19), 150. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.10761
Ahmad, M., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2022). Automatic content analysis of asynchronous discussion forum transcripts: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11355-11410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11065-w
Ali-Abadi, T., Babamohamadi, H., & Nobahar, M. (2020). Critical thinking skills in intensive care and medical-surgical nurses and their explaining factors. Nurse education in practice, 45, 102783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102783
Andreatos, A., Vomvyras, D., & Douligeris, C. (2022). Exam wizard e-assessment platform: new features, field test results and instructor’s experience. Proceedings of the 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, 25-27 November 2022, Athens, Greece, 200-206. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575879.3575993
Antonella, P., Carlo, D.M., Francesca, A. (2020). A Prototype for the Automatic Assessment of Critical Thinking. In M. Rehm, J. Saldien, & S. Manca (Eds.), Project and design literacy as cornerstones of smart education (pp. 143–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9652-6_13
Arsyad, Z., Wati, M., & Suyidno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of the module static fluid with authentic learning to train students' problem-solving skills. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.1017
Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Effectivenes of using e-module and e-assessment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(9), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.11016
Chang-Tik, C. (2018). Impact of learning styles on the community of inquiry presences in multi-disciplinary blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 827-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1419495
Chiche, A., & Yitagesu, B. (2022). Part of speech tagging: a systematic review of deep learning and machine learning approaches. Journal of Big Data, 9(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00561-y
Cindikia, M., Achmadi, H. R., Prahani, B. K., & Mahtari, S. (2020). Profile of students’ problem solving skills and the implementation of assisted guided inquiry model in senior high school. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.22
Esra, M. E. Ş. E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.
Gambrill, E. (2018). Critical thinking and the process of evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.
Harjono, A., Gunawan, G., Adawiyah, R., & Herayanti, L. (2020). An interactive e-book for physics to improve students' conceptual mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(5), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.10967
Kusairi, S., Noviandari, L., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Analysis of students' understanding of motion in straight line concepts: Modeling Instruction with Formative E-Assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12423a
Lim, J., Whitehead, G. E., & Choi, Y. (2021). Interactive e-book reading vs. paper-based reading: Comparing the effects of different mediums on middle school students’ reading comprehension. System, 97(4), 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102434
Lin, S., Hu, H. C., & Chiu, C. K. (2020). Training practices of self-efficacy on critical thinking skills and literacy: Importance-performance matrix analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1794. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112202
Lu, S. N. T., & Nguyen, H. B. (2022). University students’critical thinking skills: Teachers’perceptions and practices in argumentative essays. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(4), 69-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i4.4417
Maryuningsih, Y., Hidayat, T., Riandi, R., & Rustaman, N. (2020). Developing performance assessment instruments to measure 4C skills in online discussion activities of science learning. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(1), 109-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i1.7500
Moser, S., & Zumbach, J. (2018). Exploring the development and impact of learning styles: An empirical investigation based on explicit and implicit measures. Computers & Education, 125, 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.003
Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., Cosgun, V., & Altan, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 141(11), 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618
Negoro, R. A., Rusilowati, A., Aji, M. P., & Jaafar, R. (2020). Critical thinking in Physics: Momentum critical thinking test for pre-service teacher. Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4834
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A
Papp, J. (2018). Quality management in the imaging sciences e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Peck, I., & Hannafin, M. J. (1993). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297358
Rachmawati, R., Sari, A. D., Sukawan, H. A. R., Widhyastana, I. M. A., & Ghiffari, R. A. (2021). The use of ICT-based applications to support the implementation of smart cities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Infrastructures, 6(9), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6090119
Rahmawati, T., Suhanda, H., Sabilla, F. I. A., & Suryatna, A. (2022). Implementation of practicum worksheets based on guided inquiry on the topic of colloids to improve students' science process skills. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA (JIPI), 6(4), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i4.28354
Ramadhani, V. Y., & Khusniati, M. (2022). Development of interactive e-books containing virtual laboratory to improve students’ motivation learning. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v2i1.53125
Riduwan, S. P. (2016). Variabel-variabel penelitian [Experiment scale]. Alfa Beta
Rolfe, G., & Freshwater, D. (2020). Critical reflection in practice: Generating knowledge for care. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Saripudin, D., Fauzi, W. I., & Nugraha, E. (2022). The development of interactive e-book of local history for senior high school in improving local wisdom and digital literacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.17
Shabrina, A., & Astuti, U. P. (2022). The integration of 6Cs of the 21st century education into english skills: Teachers’ challenges and solutions. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 7(1). 28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i1.15185
Süzen, N., Gorban, A. N., Levesley, J., & Mirkes, E. M. (2020). Automatic short answer grading and feedback using text mining methods. Procedia Computer Science, 169, 726-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.171
Thamrin, H., Verdikha, N. A., & Triyono, A. (2021). Text classification and similarity algorithms in essay grading. Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Indonesia, 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI54043.2021.9702808
Trifunović, A., Čičević, S., Pešić, D., Samčović, A., & Marković, V. (2023). Surveying disadvantaged children’s traffic safety education in a comparison between paper and electronic methods: A case example for the expanded use of educational technology. Transportation research record, 2677(2), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221106477
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019900176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2021). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Routledge.
Wanna, W. O., & de Jesus Simôes, M. D. F. (2021). Impact of learning styles on higher distance learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 21(1), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i1.4047
Yorganci, S. (2022). The interactive e‐book and video feedback in a multimedia learning environment: Influence on performance, cognitive, and motivational outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 1005-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12658
Copyright (c) 2023 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
