The Effect of Rode Learning Model on Enhancing Students Communication Skills
Abstract
Communication skills in physics learning are essential to life talents that can be used to solve problems in everyday life. The Read Outline Discussion Evaluation (RODE) model is a learning tool designed to help students improve their communication skills. This research was conducted in the Elementary School Teacher Study Program with Basic Science 2nd material and involved 100 students. This study focuses on improving students' writing communication skills before and after the teaching process with the RODE learning model to determine the effectiveness of the RODE learning model. This study used one group pretest-posttest design (O1-x-O2). Before being applied to the RODE learning model, the average score of the indicators of students' written communication skills was at a low level (1, 24), and it had a score of 3.68 (high level) after the RODE learning model was implemented. This result shows that the RODE model significantly impacts students' written communication skills in the high category for both classes. In addition, students' written communication skills improved in the high category, N-gain significantly increased in the high criteria, and consistent N-gain was observed in the Elementary School Teacher Study Program.
Downloads
References
Arends., R. I. (2012). Learning to teach, ninth edition (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Barrett, T. E. (2011). Fundamentals of physics : Condensed (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/20591/
Borich, G. (1994). Observation skill for effective teaching. Mac Millan Publishing Company.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. In ASCD (Vol. 88, Issue 18). ASCD. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741808801819
Carolin, Y., Saputro, S., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2015). Metode pembelajaran problem solving dilengkapi lks untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan prestasi belajar pada materi hukum dasar kimia siswa kelas X MIA 1. Jurnal.Fkip.Uns.Ac.Id, 4(4), 46–53. http://www.jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/kimia/article/view/6569
Carreño, I. del V. G. (2014). Theory of connectivity as an emergent solution to innovative learning strategies. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-2-7
Corbett, F., & Spinello, E. (2020). Connectivism and leadership: harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. Heliyon, 6(1), e03250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03250
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. In National Research Council Canada. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Connectivism+and+Connective+Knowledge+Essays+on+meaning+and+learning+networks#0
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2015). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms, Global edition. In Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms, Global Edition.
Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D., & Warren, A. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020103
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Greenhill, V., & Petroff, S. (2010). The 21st Century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. In Education (Issue September). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-for-the-21st-century_9789264193864-en
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introduc. American Association of Physics Teachers, 64(1998). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Bowen, G. H. (1972). Fundamentals of physics. In Physics Today (Vol. 25, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3070817
Hunaidah, M., Susantini, E., & Wasis, W. (2019). Validitas model pembelajaran CinQASE untuk meningkatkan keterampilan Individual Critical Thinking (INCT) dan Collaborative Critical Thinking (CCT). Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 1–4. http://103.76.50.195/semnasfisika/article/view/8680
Kulgemeyer, C., & Schecker, H. (2013). Students explaining science-assessment of science communication competence. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2235–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9354-1
Kulsum, U., & Nugroho, S. . (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran cooperative problem. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 3(2).
Kusuma, A. E., Wasis, Susantini, E., & Rusmansyah. (2020). Physics innovative learning: RODE learning model to train student communication skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012016
Limatahu, I., Wasis, W., Suyatno, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Development of CCDSR teaching model to improve science process skills of pre-service physics teacher. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 812–827.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psychology. In John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 53(9). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Oktaviani, A. N., & Nugroho, S. E. (2015). Model creative problem solving. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v4i1.4733
Overton, T. L., & Randles, C. A. (2015). Beyond problem-based learning: Using dynamic PBL in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00248b
Prahani, B. K., Limatahu, I., Soegimin, Yuanita, W. W., & Nur, M. (2016). Effectiveness of physics learning material through guided inquiry model to improve student’s problem solving skills based on multiple representation. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(12), 231–242.
Qodry, I., Nuroso, H., & Susilawati, S. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning melalui pendekatan saintifik terhadap kemampuan berkomunikasi ilmiah pada kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Rembang. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i1.1151
Sarwi, Rusilowati, A., & Khanafiyah, S. (2013). Implementasi model eksperimen gelombang open-inquiry untuk mengembangkan keterampilan komunikasi ilmiah mahasiswa fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 9(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v9i2.3028
Serway, R. a., & Jewett, J. W. (2008). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physic, 7 ed. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Le, 739(1215). http://books.google.com/books?id=XgweHqlvtiUC&pgis=1
Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Kepraktisan model pembelajaran Investigation Based Multiple Representation (IBMR) dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i2.1307
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology. In Psychological Bulletin (12th ed., Vol. 17, Issue 11). Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071574
Stavropoulou, A., & Stroubouki, T. (2014). Evaluation of educational programmes - The contribution of history to modern evaluation thinking. Health Science Journal, 8(2), 193–204.
Trihendardi, C. (2012). Step by Step SPSS 20 Analisis Data Statistik. Andi Offset.
Wangsa, P. G., Suyana, I., Amalia, L., & Setiawan, A. (2017). TSTS ( Pada Materi Gerak Lurus di SMAN 6 Bandung ). Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 27–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i2.8274
Woolfolk, A. (2017). Anita Woolfolk - Educational Psychology-Pearson International (2016) (Issue December). Pearson Education, Inc.
Zhou, Q., Huang, Q., & Tian, H. (2013). Developing students’ critical thinking skills by task-based learning in chemistry experiment teaching. Creative Education, 04(12), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412a1006
Zia, S. (2017). Revision Guide Series O Level Physics (2nd ed.). Read & Write Publications.
Zulfa, A. R., & Rosyidah, Z. (2020). Analysis of communication skills of junior high school students on classification of living things topic. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2078
Copyright (c) 2022 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
