Blended Approach to Physics Problem-Solving Using Conventional and Virtual Labs: A Survey of Student’s Perception

  • Mamta Pal Department of Teacher Education, Central University of South Bihar, India
  • Rinki Department of Teacher Education, Central University of South Bihar, India
Keywords: Perception, Higher secondary students, Problem-solving, Blend, Conventional and virtual labs


Physics education entails rigorous problem-solving. But physics is full of abstraction and mathematical representations, which are hard to visualize. Hence, understanding the problems requires constant lab activities essential to physics problem-solving. But due to limited equipment and limited periods of usage in conventional labs, virtual labs are an alternative with their own set of limitations. So, a blend of the two virtual and conventional labs is a better option for problem-solving. A mixed-method approach was adopted to know the perception of higher secondary students towards this blended approach. For this, 150 CBSE board higher secondary students of science stream selected using convenient sampling from Lucknow were surveyed using a Likert-type perception scale comprising 15 items followed by an unstructured interview to know the preferred mode for physics problem-solving. The data so obtained were expressed in percentages. The study revealed that most students agreed with the overall perceived benefits of using conventional and virtual labs separately. But due to the inherent problems of these labs separately, students perceived the benefits offered by the blend of conventional and virtual labs in physics problem-solving more than using them separately. A blend of conventional and virtual labs should be used more often.


Download data is not yet available.


Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2015). Analyzing the many skills involved in solving complex physics problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 459-467.

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garret, R. (2007). Blending in: the extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Methodology, 1-29.

Asal, V., & Blake, E. L. (2006). Creating simulations for political science education. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 1-18.

Asikoy, G., & Isek, D. (2017). The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’ attitudes in a general physics laboratory. IJOE, 13(4).

Ausubel, D. P. (1971). The psychology of meaningful learning. Grune and Stratton.

Avramiotis, S., & Tsaparlis, G. (2013). Using computer simulations in chemistry problem-solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 297–311.

Ayas, A., Karamustafaoğlu, S., Sevim, S., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2002). Genel kimya laboratuar uygulamalarının öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı gözüyle değerlendirilmesi. [Academicians' and students' views of general chemistry laboratory applications]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 50-56.

Bajpai, M. (2013). Developing concepts in physics through virtual lab experiment: An effectiveness study. Techno Learn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 43-50.

Ceberio, M., Almudi, J. M., & Franco, A. (2016). Design and application of interactive simulations in problem-solving in university-level physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 590-609.

Çildir, I. (2005). Identification of high school students’ misconception about electric current by concept maps. [Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University].

Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J., Simon, M., & Hopkins, J. (2014). Are virtual labs as effective as hands-on labs for undergraduate physics? A comparative study at two major universities. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 23, 803–814.

De-Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.

Demir, S., Böyük, U., & Koç, A. (2011). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin laboratuvar şartları ve kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri ile teknolojik yenilikleri izleme eğilimleri. [Opinions of science and technology teachers about laboratory conditions and usage and trends in monitoring technological innovations]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 7(2), 66-79.

Demiraslan-Çevik, Y., Haslaman, T., & Çelik, S. (2015). The effect of peer assessment on problem-solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 44(1), 23–35.

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2010). A conceptual approach to physics problem-solving. American Institute of Physics, 1289(1), 137-140.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 0201191-02011958.

Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., Mason, A., Ryan, Q. X., & Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 10130.

Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2016). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374.

Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 10103.

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Herayanti, L. (2017). Virtual laboratory to improve students’ problem-solving skills on electricity concept. Jurnal Pendidikan (IPA) Indonesia, 6(2), 257-264.

Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.

Herga, N. R., Cagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 593–608.

Ibrahim, B., & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Representational task format and problem-solving strategies in kinematics and work. Physics Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 0101261- 01012619.

Jian-hua, S., & hong, L. (2012). Explore the effective use of multimedia technology in college physics teaching. Energy Procedia, 17, 1897–1900.

Jones, N. (2018). Simulated labs are booming. Nature, 562(7725), S5–S5.

Junglas, P. (2006). Simulation programs for teaching thermodynamics. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 10(2), 175-180.

Koç, C. (2015). Perceptions of primary school students for problem-solving skills and their help-seeking during learning process. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(2), 659-678.

Kolil, V. K., Muthupalani, S., & Achuthan, K. (2020). Virtual experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher education, 17(30), 1-22.

Mashami, R., & Gunawan, G. (2018). The influence of sub-microscopic media animation on students’ critical thinking skills based on gender. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1108, 0121061-0121068.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students’ conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Identifying conceptual students in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52.

National Council of Educational Research and Training (n.d.). Revised syllabus of physics higher secondary stage.

Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., & Nafalski, A. (2003). Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003., 1, T3E-T3E.

Okeke, R. J. (1995). Principles of development selection, utilization, evaluation storage, and retrieval of instructional materials. In F. A. Okwo, & G. A. Ike (Eds.), Educational technology: Basic concepts of issues (pp. 45-76). University Trust Publishers.

Orbay M., Özdoğan T., Öner F., Kara M., & Gümüş S. (2003). Fen bilgisi laboratuvar uygulamaları I-II dersinde karşılaşılan güçlükler ve çözüm önerileri [Difficulties encountered in science lab laboratory applications I-II lesson and solution proposals]. Journal of National Education, 157.

Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2007). Learner performance and attitudes in traditional versus simulated laboratory experiences. Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2007, 870-879.

Rahmawati, W., Putri Z. R., & Arinda, Y. (2017). Potential of blended learning to optimize performance outcome, motivation, and science communication in physics course. [Conference presentation abstract]. The 3rd International Seminar on Science Education, Graduate School of Yogyakarta State University.

Ritchie, J. B., & Thompson, P. (1988). Organization and people. West Publishing Co.

Rodríguez, J., Gutiérrez, T., Sánchez, E. J., Casado, S., & Aguinaga, I. (2012). Training of procedural tasks through the use of virtual reality and direct aids. In C. S. Lanyi (Ed.), Virtual reality environments (pp. 43–68). InTech.

Rosengrant, D., Van-Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams?. Physics Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(010108).

Shih, K. J., Singh, S., & Hoiem, D. (2016). Where to look: Focus regions for visual question answering. Computers Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1(1), 4613–4621.

Subali, B., Rusdiana, D., Firman, H., Kaniawati, I., & Ellianawati, E. (2017). Computer-based experiment of free fall movement to improve the graphical literacy. Indonesia Journal of Science and Education, 6(1).

Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.

Ullah, S., Ali, N., & Rahman, S. U. (2016). The effect of procedural guidance on students’ skill enhancement in a virtual chemistry laboratory, Journal of Chemical Education, 93(12), 2018–2025.

Yang, K. Y., & Heh, J. S. (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills, and computer attitudes of 10th -grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 451–461.

Yeşilyurt, M., Kurt, T., & Temur, A. (2005). İlköğretim fen laboratuvarı için tutum anketi geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması [Development and application of attitude questionnaire for primary science laboratory]. Pamukkake University Journal of Education, 17, 23–37.

Yuliati, L., Riantoni, C., & Mufti, N. (2018). Problem-solving skills on direct current electricity through inquiry-based learning with PhET simulations. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 123–138.

How to Cite
Pal, M., & Rinki. (2022). Blended Approach to Physics Problem-Solving Using Conventional and Virtual Labs: A Survey of Student’s Perception. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 97-106.