Beyond Traditional Practicums: Exploring the Potential of Scalable Practicum in Science Courses
Abstract
Initiated during the Covid-19 pandemic, this study examines the development and use of virtual laboratories at 'Universitas Terbuka' to facilitate science practicums. Initially a response to pandemic restrictions, these virtual labs proved to be invaluable due to the widespread geographic distribution of students across the Indonesian archipelago. As the world transitions to a new normal, with possibilities for on-site practical experiences resuming, this paper discusses how virtual labs can continue to ensure equitable access to practical science education. This aspect of equal opportunity in education, whether online or on-site, is termed 'scalable practicum' in this study. By using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, the paper evaluates the effectiveness of these virtual labs in providing hands-on scientific experimentation experiences that are both accessible and flexible. The findings suggest that, even beyond pandemic constraints, virtual labs remain a feasible and efficient alternative to traditional in-person labs, significantly enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes. This paper emphasizes the adaptability of virtual labs to various learning contexts and their importance in the evolving landscape of science education. The study concludes by recommending further research with a broader demographic to thoroughly evaluate the long-term viability and impact of online scalable practicums in science learning.
Downloads
References
Akimov, A., & Malin, M. (2020). When old becomes new: A case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730301
Alexiou, A., Bouras, C., Giannaka, E., Kapoulas, V., Nani, M., & Tsiatsos, T. (2004). Using VR technology to support e-learning: The 3D virtual radiopharmacy laboratory. 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2004.1284042
Amanda, L., Baxter., R., F., Lang., Craig, Zywicki., Stephanie, M., Gardner., A., Kopec., Andreas, Emanuel, Jung. (2023). A scalable approach to undergraduate research in physics. arXiv Preprint.
Bhaumik, R., & Priyadarshini, A. (2020). E-readiness of senior secondary school learners to online learning transition amid COVID-19 lockdown. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15, 44–256. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3891822
Bidaki, M. Z. (2018). Application of virtual reality simulators and virtual labs in medical education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 9(1), 2173–2175. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijvlms.66284
Bodnarova, A., Sobeslav, V., Horalek, J., Matyska, J., & Hatas, M. (2013). Virtual laboratory. 2013 IEEE 11th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2013.6674403
Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: An academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2020-0079
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28, 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
Commager, H. S. (1992). The twelfth annual international conference on critical thinking and educational reform. Conference on Critical Thinking and Educational Reform, 129.
Cooper, J. M., & Allen, D. W. (1971). Microteaching: History and present status. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
Copriady, J. (2014). Teachers competency in the teaching and learning of chemistry practical. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p312
Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.005
Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019
Demircioğlu, G., & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2011). The effect of laboratory method on high school students’understanding of the reaction rate. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), 509–516.
Domínguez, J. C., Miranda, R., González, E. J., Oliet, M., & Alonso, M. V. (2018). A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002
Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H., & Wiegand, C. (2016). Virtual laboratories in science education: Students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257498
Ed-Era. (2021). Technological competency. Digital Competency Profiler. https://dcp.eilab.ca/
Faqih, A. (2015). Optimalisasi pemanfaatan KIT-IPA PGSD untuk peningkatan keterampilan proses sains pada pelaksanaan tutorial praktikum IPA di SD. Widyagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.21107/widyagogik.v3i1.2645
Firmansyah, J., & Suhandi, A. (2021). Critical thinking skills and science process skills in physics practicum. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012047
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
García-Carmona, A., & Acevedo-Díaz, J. A. (2018). The nature of scientific practice and science education: Rationale of a set of essential pedagogical principles. Science & Education, 27(5), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9984-9
Glen, S. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha: Simple definition, use and interpretation. Statistics How To. https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/statistics-definitions/cronbachs-alpha-spss/
Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., & Álvarez-García, F. J. (2020). A study on the actual use of digital competence in the practicum of education degree. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9390-z
Habig, B., & Gupta, P. (2021). Authentic STEM research, practices of science, and interest development in an informal science education program. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00314-y
Herga, N. R., Čagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a
Hidayat, A. (2021, August). Membuat R tabel dalam excel (Tabel R). Statistikian. https://www.statistikian.com/2012/08/membuat-r-tabel-dalam-excel.html
I, Putu, Artayasa., Muhlis, Muhlis., I, Wayan, Merta., A, Sukarso., Gito, Hadiprayitno. (2023). Open Inquiry Practicum: An Effective Strategy for Enhancing Science Process Skills of Prospective Biology Teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 9(3), 1352-1359. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.3248
Islam, A. T., Flint, J., Jaecks, P., & Cap, C. H. (2017). A proficient and versatile online student-teacher collaboration platform for large classroom lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0067-9
Kfir, R. E. (2002). Virtual laboratories in education. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality and Visualisation, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/513867.513874
Kırıkçılar, R. G., & Yıldız, A. (2019). Developing an observation form to determine the TPACK usage. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(4), 172–181.
Kruse, J., Kent-Schneider, I., Voss, S., Zacharski, K., & Rockefeller, M. (2021). Investigating student nature of science views as reflections of authentic science: Degrees of contextualisation and the teachers’ role. Science & Education, 30 (5), 1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00231-0
Kusmawan, U. (2016). Kesiapan belajar mandiri guru sekolah dasar: Studi kasus pada program studi PGSD pada FKIP Universitas Terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.406
Kusmawan, U. (2017). Online microteaching: A multifaceted approach to teacher professional development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 15(1), 42–56.
Kusmawan, U., & Handayani, M. (2021). Memahami scalable practicum. Digital Book.
Kusumaningsih, Y. R., Iswahyudi, C., & Susanti, E. (2014). Pengembangan model laboratorium virtual sebagai solusi keterbatasan sumber daya pembelajaran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains & Teknologi (SNAST), 301–306.
Ligoxygakis, P. (2001). Virtual lab brings science to life. Trends in Genetics, 17(6), 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02360-5
Listyarini, R. V., Pamenang, F. D. N., Harta, J., Wijayanti, L. W., Asy’ari, M., & Lee, W. (2019). The integration of green chemistry principles into small scale chemistry practicum for senior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19250
Martin, K., Cupples, A., & Taherzadeh, S. (2020). Learning advanced engineering online: From distance delivery to online learning of finite element analysis. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1647408
McComas, W. F. (2014). Authentic science learning contexts. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Language of Science Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_9
Mesci, G., Schwartz, R. S., & Pleasants, B. A.-S. (2020). Enabling factors of preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 29(2), 263–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00090-w
Mohd, Azrin, Mohd, Nasir., Suzila, Ismail., Nor, A'tikah, Mat, Ali., Farah, Nadia, Mohd, Faudzi. (2024). Beyond Traditional Methods: Utilizing a Hybrid SIRe Model for Optimal Counselling Skill Development in Practicum Courses. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3):157-176. doi: 10.29333/iji.2024.1739a
Ndukwe, I. G., & Daniel, B. K. (2020). Teaching analytics, value and tools for teacher data literacy: A systematic and tripartite approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00201-6
Nesenbergs, K., Abolins, V., Ormanis, J., & Mednis, A. (2020). Use of augmented and virtual reality in remote higher education: A systematic umbrella review. Education Sciences, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010008
Ocak, G., & Eğmir, E. (2016). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ critical thinking tendencies and problem solving skills. Participatory Educational Research, 3(5), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.16.spi.2.4
Owen, D. (2019). Thinking: Discover the key skills and tools you will need for critical thinking, decision making and problem solving (1st ed.). DPW Publishing.
Permanasari, A., Sariningrum, A., Rubini, B., & Ardianto, D. (2021). Improving students’ scientific literacy through science learning with socio scientific issues (SSI). Proceedings of the 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.068
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Qiang, Z., Obando, A. G., Chen, Y., & Ye, C. (2020). Revisiting distance learning resources for undergraduate research and lab activities during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3446–3449. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00609
Raharjo, S. (2021). Cara melakukan uji validitas product moment dengan SPSS. Tutorial SPSS, Uji instrumen SPSS Indonesia. https://www.spssindonesia.com/2014/01/uji-validitas-product-momen-spss.html
Rohim, F. (2020). Need analysis of virtual laboratories for science education in Jambi, Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(2), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i2.11539
Statistics Laerd. (2018). Cronbach’s alpha (α) using SPSS statistics. Https://Statistics.Laerd.Com/Spss-Tutorials/Cronbachs-Alpha-Using-Spss-Statistics.Php. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/cronbachs-alpha-using-spss-statistics.php
Suchyadi, Y., & Karmila, N. (2019). The application of assignment learning group methods through micro scale practicum to improve elementary school teacher study program college students’ skills and interests in following science study courses. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 3(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v3i2.1466
Suci, N., Nunuk, S., & Suharno, S. (2021). Online learning with virtual laboratory: The effectiveness of science learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pedagogical Innovations in Education, 98–106.
Supanji, T. H. (2021, October 10). Pemerintah perkuat program transisi pandemi menjadi endemic. Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture. https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/pemerintah-perkuat-program-transisi-pandemi-menjadi-endemik
Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159–170.
Thompson, K., Corrin, L., Hwang, G.-J., & Lodge, J. M. (2021). Trends in education technology in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7396
Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37–53.
UNICEF-Indonesia. (2021, September 15). Indonesia: After 18 months of school closures, children must safely resume face-to-face learning as soon as possible. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/press-releases/indonesia-after-18-months-school-closures-children-must-safely-resume-face-face
Universitas Terbuka. (2022). The results of Inter-Item Correlation Matrix. https://sl.ut.ac.id/Virlab-PublishData-2022
UT Team. (2020). Katalog PENDAS Universitas Terbuka 2019/2020 (2020/2021). Universitas Terbuka.
Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation: Critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
Wan, Z. H., Wong, S. L., & Zhan, Y. (2013). Teaching nature of science to preservice science teachers: A phenomenographic study of Chinese teacher educators’ conceptions. Science & Education, 22(10), 2593–2619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9595-4
Widowati, A., Nurohman, S., & Anjarsari, P. (2017). Developing science learning material with authentic inquiry learning approach to improve problem solving and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.4851
Widowati, A., Nurohman, S., & Setyowarno, D. (2017). Development of inquiry-based science virtual laboratory for improving student thinking skill of junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 170–177.
Wijayanto, P. A., Rizal, M. F., Subekti, E. A. K. E., & Novianti, T. A. (2018). Pentingnya pengembangan geography virtual laboratory (Geo V-Lab) sebagai media pembelajaran litosfer. Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik), 3(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v3n2.p119-125
Copyright (c) 2024 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
