CPjBL Versus PjBL Instruction: The Practice of Reviewing Literature From Reputable Journals
Abstract
The present study compared the quality of student projects in reviewing literature from reputable journals using computer-assisted project-based learning (CPjBL) and traditional project-based learning (PjBL). This experimental study involved students from a research methodology course at a private university. Experimental group one implemented CPjBL, and experimental group two applied PjBL. The analysis results showed a mean score of 76.41, a standard deviation value of 9.105 for CPjBL, a mean score of 69.78, and a standard deviation value of 9.983 for PjBL. These results suggest that while the mean score of CPjBL was higher than that of PjBL, the difference was insignificant. In conclusion, in a research methodology course, CPjBL is suitable for helping students generate research ideas by optimizing software to review literature from reputable journals.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Rineka Cipta.
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2018). Project‐based learning and technology. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7.
Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project maidenhead. Open University Press.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43.
Beswick, K. (2021). Inquiry-based approaches to mathematics learning, teaching, and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09494-4
Bilgin, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Ay, Y. (2015). The effects of project-based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(3).
Brengarth, L. B., & Mujkic, E. (2016). WEB 2.0: How social media applications leverage nonprofit responses during a wildfire crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 589–596.
Cahyono, E. A., Sutomo, N., & Hartono, A. (2019). Literatur review: Panduan penulisan dan penyusunan. Jurnal Keperawatan, 12(2), 12.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Cavanaugh, C. (2004). Project-based learning in undergraduate educational technology. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2010–2016.
ChanLin, L. J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701757450
Crismond, D. P. (2011). Scaffolding strategies for integrating engineering design and scientific inquiry in project-based learning environments. Fostering Human Development Through Engineering and Technology Education, 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-549-9_13
di Gregorio, S. (2000). Using Nvivo for your literature review. Strategies in Qualitative Research: Issues and Results from Analysis Using QSR NVivo and NUD* IST Conference at the Institute of Education, London, 29–30.
Donnelly, R. (2005). Online problem-based learning approach in higher education. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp. 1402–1411). IGI Global.
García, C. (2016). Project-based learning in virtual groups-collaboration and learning outcomes in a virtual training course for teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 100–105.
Gómez-Pablos, V. B., del Pozo, M. M., & Muñoz-Repiso, A. G.-V. (2017). Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 501–512.
Huang, L., Doorman, M., & van Joolingen, W. (2021). Inquiry-based learning practices in lower-secondary mathematics education reported by students from China and the Netherlands. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(7), 1505–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10122-5
Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-y
Hung, C.-M., Hwang, G.-J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379.
Kanaya, T., Light, D., & McMillan Culp, K. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313–329.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1926). The Project method: The use of the purposeful act in the educative process. Kessinger Publishing.
Koh, J. H. L., Herring, S. C., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 284–291.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.
Kwon, H., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). When I believe, I can: Success STEMs from my perceptions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00132-4
Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 65–84.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. ASCD.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37.
Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2008). Investigating changes in prospective teachers’ views of a ‘good teacher’while engaging in computerized project-based learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 259–284.
Lipson, A., Epstein, A. W., Bras, R., & Hodges, K. (2007). Students’ perceptions of Terrascope, a project-based freshman learning community. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(4), 349–364.
Lloyd, G. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 149–159). Springer.
Olesen, H. S., & Jensen, J. H. (1999). Project studies: A late modern university reform.
Oliver, P. (2013). Writing your thesis. Sage.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass.
Principles, N. (2000). Standards for school mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Inc.
Ralph, R. A. (2016). Post-secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 26–35.
Ravitz, J., & Blazevski, J. (2014). Assessing the role of online technologies in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 9.
Rosalia, R., & Fuad, A. J. (2019). Peran dosen dalam meminimalisasi perilaku plagiasi mahasiswa. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 2(1), 61–77.
Shishkovskaya, J., Bakalo, D., & Grigoryev, A. (2015). EFL teaching in the e-learning environment: updated principles and methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 199–204.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.
Stozhko, N., Bortnik, B., Mironova, L., Tchernysheva, A., & Podshivalova, E. (2015). Interdisciplinary project-based learning: Technology for improving student cognition. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006). Assessment of achievement and personal qualities under constructions learning environment. Education, 126(3).
Tiro, M. A. (2000). Dasar-dasar statistika. Andira.
von Kotze, A., & Cooper, L. (2000). Exploring the transformative potential of project-based learning in university adult education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 32(2), 212–228.
Wolpert-Gawron, H. (2016). DIY project-based learning for math and science. Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2024 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
