Flood Alarm Prototype: A STEAM Project to Study Physics and Building Students’ Awareness of Natural Disasters

  • Inanda Aulia Rizqillah Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Eko Hariyono Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Daliana Fehabutar Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords: Flood alarm, Natural disasters, STEAM education

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with a significant portion of its territory consisting of water bodies, which makes it prone to flooding. Therefore, the development of an early warning system in the form of a flood alarm prototype is crucial. This research is designed using the Design Thinking models method. Based on the created prototype, STEAM-based learning can be implemented to enable students to learn physics through scientific steps. It also fosters critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication skills in accordance with the 21st-century concept, while increasing students' awareness of natural disasters in their surroundings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.

An, L., & Yang, J.-W. (2020). Research on the teaching design and experiment in physics education at a junior high school based on STEAM education and 6E learning process. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education, Economics and Management Research (ICEEMR 2019), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191221.145

Asemanyi, A. A. (2015). An assessment of students' performance in communication skills: A case study of the University of Education Winneba. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 1-7.

Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher's experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112-128.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10-15.

Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239-263.

BNPB. (2022). Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. [Online]. http://dibi.bnpb.go.id/

Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say?. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23-41.

Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. Routledge.

Chen, Y., & Chang, C.-C. (2018). The impact of an integrated robotics STEM course with a sailboat topic on high school students’ perceptions of integrative STEM, interest, and career orientation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1614. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94314

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard educational review, 84(4), 495-504.

Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2016). Effects of a STEAM learning program on students' creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1975090

Hsu, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). The effectiveness of using STEM integrated learning systems in elementary classrooms: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 1-12.

Hudha, M. N., Batlolona, J. R., & Wartono, W. (2019). Science literation ability and physics concept understanding in the topic of work and energy with inquiry-STEM. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2202(1), 020063. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141676

Hur, J. W., Shen, Y. W., & Cho, M. H. (2020). Impact of intercultural online collaboration project for pre-service teachers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 1-17.

Irwanto, Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, Ramadhan, M. F., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(5), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i05.27003

Islam, A. T., Flint, J., Jaecks, P., & Cap, C. H. (2017). A proficient and versatile online student-teacher collaboration platform for large classroom lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0067-9.

Kay, K., & Greenhill, V. (2011). Twenty-first century students need 21st century skills. In G. Wan & D. M. Gut (Eds.), Bringing Schools into the 21st Century (pp. 41–65). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_3

Khamhaengpol, A., Phewphong, S., & Chuamchaitrakool, P. (2022). STEAM activity on biodiesel production: Encouraging creative thinking and basic science process skills of high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00874

Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In T. Kim, A. Stoica, W. Fang, T. Vasilakos, J. G. Villalba, K. P. Arnett, M. K. Khan, & B.-H. Kang (Eds.), Computer Applications for Security, Control and System Engineering (pp. 115–121). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences.

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Lestari, S. (2021). Pengembangan orientasi keterampilan abad 21 pada pembelajaran fisika melalui pembelajaran PjBL-STEAM berbantuan Spectra-Plus. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 6(3), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v6i3.243

Liliawati, W., Rusnayati, H., Purwanto, & Aristantia, G. (2018). Implementation of STEAM education to improve mastery concept. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 012148. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012148

Malele, V., & Ramaboka, M. E. (2020). The design thinking approach to students STEAM projects. Procedia CIRP, 91, 230-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.100

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.

Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). The interaction equivalency theorem. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 94-104.

Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586

Pressick-Kilborn, K., Silk, M., & Martin, J. (2021). STEM and STEAM education in Australian K-12 schooling. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1684

Rahma, A. (2018). Implementasi program pengurangan risiko bencana (PRB) melalui pendidikan formal. Jurnal Varidika, 30(1), 1-11.

Rodriguez, B. C. P., & Armellini, A. (2015). Expanding the interaction equivalency theorem. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrod l.v16i3.2085.

Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., Noortgate, W. V. D. (2018). The factor structure of the figural Torrance tests of creative thinking: A meta-confirmatory factor analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 30(4), 352-360.

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 359-387.

Widarti, R., & Roshayanti, F. (2021). Potensi implementasi STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematic) berorientasi ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) dalam pembelajaran fluida. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 10(3), 290-295. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v10i3.55702

Widya, Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 012208. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208

Wijaya, W., Tolle, H., & Kharisma, A. P. (2017). Rancang bangun aplikasi geotagging social report bencana banjir. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(7), 2817–2824.

Published
2022-08-30
How to Cite
Rizqillah, I. A., Hariyono, E., & Fehabutar, D. (2022). Flood Alarm Prototype: A STEAM Project to Study Physics and Building Students’ Awareness of Natural Disasters. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i2.229
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 1333 times
PDF downloaded = 428 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)