Moodle as a Tool to Reduce Transactional Distance at an Open Distance and e-Learning University
Abstract
Despite the expansion of e-learning and the adoption of innovative learning management systems to support students, higher education institutions are still struggling under the burden of digital exclusion, hence increasing the transactional distance between lecturers and students. The research was conducted at a South African Open Distance and eLearning university and attempted to (1) understand how the Moodle site is organized to influence transaction distance, (2) identify students’ perceptions of the Moodle site to enhance their academic writing skills, and (3) identify if Moodle is an enabler or disabler to their learning. This article uses a qualitative participatory action research design and draws on the theory of transactional distance. Using observations, open-ended evaluation questions, and a focus group discussion, the study found that students appreciated the communication and interaction facilitated by the lecturers. Despite the challenges that students experienced, the transactional distance was reduced between lecturers and students. Although the findings of this study cannot be generalized on a broader scale, findings are in line with similar studies, amplifying the critical role of the perceptions and challenges of first-year students in HEIs to bring about the required change.
Downloads
References
Al-Hawari, F., Barham, H., Al-Sawaeer, O. Alshawabkeh, M., Alouneh, S., Daoud, M.I., Alazrai, R. (2021). Methods to achieve effective web-based learning management modules: MyGJU versus Moodle. PeerJ Computer Science 7, 498 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.498
Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S., Obeidat, Z., & Al-Dweeri, R. (2020). An empirical investigation into an examination of factors influencing university students’ behavior towards e-learning acceptance using the SEM approach. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(2).
Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3
Banna, J., Lin, M. F. G., Stewart, M. & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 249–261.
Byrnes, K. G., Kiely, P. A., Dunne, C. P., McDermott, K. W., & Coffey, J. C. (2021). Communication, collaboration, and contagion: “Virtualisation” of anatomy during COVID-19. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23649
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Dover Publications.
Dlamini, J. B. & Naidoo, G. M. (2022). First-year student experience – using digital media for teaching and learning amid Covid-19 pandemic at a rural-based campus. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 195 - 204. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2022.100302
Ellis, R. K. (2009). A Field Guide to Learning Management System. America: American Society for Training and Development (ASTD).
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1-24.
Huang, X., Chandra, A., DePaolo, C. A. & Simmons, L. L. (2016). Understanding transactional distance in web-based learning environments: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology 47, (4), 734–47.
Kgabo, M.V. (2021). Challenges experienced by lecturers in supporting students at an open distance e-learning institution. Challenges to Education: Lessons from Around the World. BCES Conference Books, 2021. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.
Krishnan, A. G., Devikrishna, D. S. & Aich, S. C. (2021). online education amidst pernicious Covid scourge: Altering traditional educational system and implementation of arts-friendly distance education strategies. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 7470.
McClure, C., & Williams, P. (2021). Gather.town: An opportunity for self-paced learning in a synchronous, distance-learning environment. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v14i2.1232
Moodle. (2019). https://Moodle.net/stats/ Accessed on 28 August 2019.
Moodle Project. (2020). Moodle statistics. https://stats.moodle.org/
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theoretical principles of distance education. Theoretical principles of distance education, 22–39.
Muschamp, A., Cus, M., Humes, T, Flowers, A. (2021). Analyzing students’ perspective of the learning management system moodle at the University of Belize. Proceedings of the Conference for MIS@UB, 4(1).
Naidoo, S. (2020). E-Assessments—A comparison of the grades of self-regulated versus nonself-regulated learners in an L2 module. Paper presented at the DigiTAL 2020 International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning in the Digital Age, Durban.
Ndlovu, M. C., & Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher perceptions of moodle and throughput in a blended learning programme for in-service secondary school mathematics teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131-15.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14.
Participatory Methods. (2018). Participatory Methods, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Quansah, R. & Essıam, C. (2021). The use of learning management system (LMS) moodle in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic: Students’ perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(3), 418-431. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.934730
Quong, J., Snider, S. L. & Early, J. (2018). Reducing transactional distance in online and blended courses through the use of a closed social media platform. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 79–100.
Romero-Sánchez, D. & Barrios, D. (2022). Technological acceptance of virtual platforms in university students: an analysis in times of pandemic. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/RITA.2022.3149782.
Saidi, M. D. R., Sharip, A., Rahim, N., Zulkifli, Z. A. & Zain, S. (2021). Evaluating students' preferences of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) tools. Procedia Computer Science, 179, 955-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.085.
Sevnarayan, K. (2022a). Reimaging eLearning technologies to support students: On reducing transactional distance at an open and distance eLearning institution. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221096535
Sevnarayan, K. (2022b). A trajectory towards a culture of quality: A phenomenological study of an open distance learning University in South Africa and in China. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 7(3), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2022.16
Sevnarayan, K. (2022c). Podcasting through the Pandemic: Students’ Perceptions and Performance at an ODeL Institution, Edutech, 21 (2), https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v21i1.42543
Sevnarayan, K. (2022d). ‘Your voice counts’: Understanding how online student evaluations encourage lecturers’ pedagogies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 4 (2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.202218458
Sevnarayan, K., & Mohale, N.E. (2022). overcoming transactional distance through implementing podcasts and vodcasts: Perceptions from an open distance and e-learning university. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 6(2). https:// doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v6i2.66813
Rahayu, P., Mustofa, M., & Rahmah, D. A. (2022). The effectiveness of using moodle to the students. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 316– 328. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v11i2.4540
Setiadi, P. M., Alia, D., Sumardi, S., Respati, R., & Nur, L. (2021). Synchronous or asynchronous? Various online learning platforms studied in Indonesia 2015–2020. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1987. IOP Publishing.
Schreiber, B. R. & Jansz, M. (2019). Reducing distance through online international collaboration. ELT Journal, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cc045
Singh, D. (2022). A case study on Moodle: An effective learning management system in the present scenario. International journal of multidisciplinary educational research, 11(4), 11-18.
Shalhoub, M. M., & Kunt, N. (2021). Online distance learning experience in the light of covid-19 pandemic in higher education in palestine: EFL Instructors’ and Learners’ Perspectives. 4th International conference of advanced research in education.
Sinaga, R. R. F., & Pustika, R. (2021). Exploring students' attitude towards english online learning using moodle during covid-19 pandemic at SMK Yadika Bandarlampung. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.33365/JELTL.V2I1.850
Swart, W. & MacLeod, K. (2021). Evaluating learning space designs for flipped and collaborative learning: A transactional distance approach. Education Sciences, 11(6), 292. https:// doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060292
Taamneh, A., Alsaad, A., Elrehail, H., Al-Okaily, M., Lutfi, A. and Sergio, R. P. (2022). University lecturers acceptance of Moodle platform in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Knowledge, Memory, and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-05-2021-0087
Truong, H. N. (2021). Students' perception towards the use of moodle-based LMS in learning speaking skills at tertiary level. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL 2021), 533, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210226.016
Tuah, N. A. A., & Naing, L. (2021). Is online assessment in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic reliable?. Siriraj Medical Journal, 73(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2021.09
Xin, N. S., Shibghatullah, A. S., Subaramaniam, K. A. P., & Wahab, M. H. A. (2021). A systematic review for online learning management system. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1874(1), 12030. https://doi.org/10. 1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012030
Zhang, A. M. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Commonwealth University, Virginia.
Copyright (c) 2023 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
