The Novelty of Religion and Art: Should We Combine with STEM Education?
One of the meaningful learning implications is the formation of Long-Term Memory (LTM). Through the development of concepts related to the problems of everyday life that bridge LTM and the implementation of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) as an educational approach, it enables students to realize the importance of knowledge for society. However, some aspects of society are excluded from STEM, in that way a transformation needs to be carried out. Art and Religion need to be developed in STEM to nurture students, environment, and society to the full. Several examples are presented to represent the relationship between STEM with art and religion, not only in terms of learning outcomes in schools, but also the expectations to create resilient people in facing the future challenges. With Science, Technology, Religion, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics (STREAM) education approach.
Abdul Razzak, N. (2020). Paulo Freire‟s critical and dialogic pedagogy and its implications for the Bahraini educational context. Educational Philosophy and Theory, (Article in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1716731
Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar”. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9
Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, R., & Purwianingsih, W. (2018). Plant physiology with mathematic and art religion engineering science and technology approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Education, 261, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.2991/icie-18.2018.8
Arikan, S., Erktin, E., & Pesen, M (2020). Development and validation of a STEM competencies assessment framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10132-3
Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.920264
Billingsley, B., Taber, K.S., Riga, F. et al. (2013). Erratum to: Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion—a preliminary enquiry. Research Science Education, 43, 1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9325-y
Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The prospect of an "A" in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2).
Good, J. J., Bourne, K. A., & Drake, R. G. (2020). The impact of classroom diversity philosophies on the STEM performance of undergraduate students of color. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104026
Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014) STEM Integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Committee on Integrated STEM Education; National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Ray Diez, C., & Tseng, K. H. (2010). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
McMorris, J. E. (2016). The role of religion and gender in shaping STEM education and workforce participation. The University of Texas at Austin.
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053.
Muslih, M. (2018). Pembelajaran ayat-ayat kawnīyah di SMA Trensains 2 Pesantren Tebuireng Jombang. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 12(2), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2018.12.2.455-480
National Art Education Association. (2019, May 23). NAEA Position Statement on STEAM Education. https://www.arteducators.org/advocacy-policy/articles/552-naea-position-statement-on-steam-education
National Research Council. 2009. Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12190
Oner, A., Nite, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. (2016). From STEM to STEAM: Students’ Beliefs About the Use of Their Creativity. STEAM, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20160202.06
Padgett, A. G. (2005). God versus technology? Science, secularity, and the theology of technology. Zygon®, 40(3), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00689.x
Padhmasari, T. (2016). Pembelajaran PAI dalam kurikulum semesta: Studi kasus di SMA Trensains Tebuireng Jombang [The Islamic education of universalism curriculum: Case study in Trensains Senior High School of Tebuireng Jombang]. [Master’s Thesis, Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/id/eprint/6229
Prabowo, M. (2007). Peran sekolah dan pendidikan kesenian sebagai pengembang ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, moral, dan agama. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 2, 1-9.
Riga F. (2020). Pragmatism John Dewey. In: Akpan B., Kennedy T.J. (eds) science education in theory and practice. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_16
Rolling, J. H. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for art+design education. Art Education, 69(4), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176848
Root-Bernstein, T. (2011, April 11). The art of scientific and technological innovations. ScienceBlogs. https://scienceblogs.com/art_of_science_learning/2011/04/11/the-art-of-scientific-and-tech-1
Shalihin, R. R., Bahriya, F., & Wantini, W. (2019). The implementation of qauniyah verses based on unification curriculum in SMA Trensains. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.18860/jmpi.v4i2.8274
Suprapto, N., Ku, C.-H., Cheng, T.-H., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Editorial: The Launch of Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education (SiPoSE). Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.3
Sutrisno, M. & Verhaak. (1993). Estetika: Filsafat keindahan. Kanisius
Suyono & Hariyanto. (2011). Belajar dan pembelajaran: Teori dan konsep dasar. Rosdakarya.
Swaminathan, S., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2015). Arts education, academic achievement and cognitive ability. In P. P. Tinio, & J. K. Smith (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 364–384). Cambridge University Press.
Taber K. S. (2020). Mediated learning leading development the social development theory of lev Vygotsky. In: Akpan B., Kennedy T.J. (eds) Science education in theory and practice. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_19
TEAL Center staff. (2011). TEAL center fact sheet no. 10: Self-regulated strategy development. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education. https://lincs.ed.gov/state-resources/federal-initiatives/teal/guide/metacognitive
The White House. (2011, January 25). Remarks by the President in State of Union Address. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/25/remarks-president-state-union-address
White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important.? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1-9.
Copyright (c) 2020 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.