Geotourism: Use of Environmentally Friendly Geological Wealth
Field Study of Kayangan Api, Mystical Tourism for the Traces of Empu Supo in Bojonegoro
Abstract
The writing of this article examines how solutions using geology can be cultivated in the management of historical sites as community ecotourism and community economic activities. The geotourism management paradigm is how tourism management can optimize the natural potential (geology) to add value to the economic well-being of local people living in the Kayangan Api area and minimize potential natural damage in Kayangan Api environment. The method used in this study is Kayangan Api tourist observation, expert interviews (guards) and literacy surveys. Therefore, this paper proposes a tourism management model. Geotourism management is grouped under five main focuses, including the formulation of natural opportunities used in tourism activities, the description of criteria for geotourism sites (Kayangan Api), the management of geotourism (Kayangan Api), and the explanation of geotourism activities and finally the indicators of success or Kayangan Api Bojonegoro Geotourism Print.
Downloads
References
Chen, A., Lu, Y., & Ng, Y. C. Y. (2015). The principles of geotourism. Springer.
Cuvier, G. (1810). The history of evolutionary thought: Extinctions. University of California.
Darsoprajitno, S. (2002). Ekologi pariwisata. Penerbit Angkasa.
Department of Culture and Tourism of Bojonegoro. (2020). Kayangan Api wisata Bojonegoro. Pemerintah Kabupaten Bojonegoro.
Dirgantara, A. R. (2012). Peran Interpreter dalam Kegiatan geowisata: Studi kasus Gunung Tangkuban Perahu.
Dowling, R. K. (2011). Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
Hermawan, H. (2017). Pengaruh daya tarik wisata, keselamatan dan sarana wisata terhadap kepuasan serta dampaknya terhadap loyalitas wisatawan : Studi community based tourism di gunung api purba Nglanggeran. Wahana Informasi Pariwisata : Media Wisata, 15(1), 562–577.
Kholish, N. (2012). Konstruksi teori paradigma Thomas, S. Kuhn. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 9(2).
Muksin, I. K. (2019). Geologi. Universitas Udayana.
Nainggolan, R. (2016). Informasi geologi lingkungan berbasis partisipasi masyarakat debagai kawasan geowisata danau toba di kabupaten Samosir. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora, (1), 22–28.
Pásková, M. (2012). Environmentalistika cestovního ruchu. Czech Journal of Tourism, 1(2).
Pendit, N. S. (2002). Ilmu pariwisata. PT Pradnya Paramita.
Pitana, I. (2009). Pengantar ilmu pariwisata. Andi.
Pitana, I. G., & Putu, G. (2009). Sosiologi pariwisata. Andi.
Purbohadiwijoyo, M. M. (1967). Hydrogeology of strato-volcanoes: A geomorphic approach. Memoires IAH Congress 1965, 293–298.
Rosana, M. F. (2016). Laporan kemajuan program academic leaderships grant (program 1-1-6) dalam kajian geodiversiti, geoheritage dan geokonversi daerah ciletuh dan cisolok, kabu. Sukabumi, menuju penetapan unesco global geopark. Fakultas Teknik Geologi Universitas Padjadjaran.
Suriasmantri, J. S. (2010). Filsafat ilmu sebagai pengantar popoler. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Sya, M. A. (2012). Geologi pariwisata. Universitas BSI Press.
UNESCO. (2006). Guidelines and criteria for national geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the Global Geoparks Network (GGN).
Copyright (c) 2023 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
