The Potency of Social Constructivism on Classroom Productivity in Universities

  • Bunmi Isaiah Omodan CAPTD Faculty of Education, Butterworth Campus, Walter Sisulu University, Republic of South Africa
Keywords: Social constructivism, University students, Classroom productivity, Transformation


Various indications, including literature, have confirmed that university classrooms are still mostly inactive and undemocratic, dominated by instructors and lecturers. That is, little or no atmosphere is created for the student to be a socially active participant in generating knowledge which appears to have affected their sociality in the university and their lives after their university education. Some university lecturers still use a traditional or a systematic colonized way of teaching. This study responded by proposing unabridged Social Constructivism (SC) to create socially active university students towards becoming productive and active citizens. This was done by answering a general question: How can SC be projected in the university classroom to create active and productive students? This study was located within a transformative paradigm in order to transform students’ inactiveness in the process of generating knowledge. Conceptual analysis was used to design the study. This was done within the principle of thematic analysis by arranging SC's assumptions into themes and making sense of them. The study thus presents that SC possesses the acumen to assist lecturers in ensuring that their classrooms are socially active towards student productivity both in the schools and in the field of work.


Download data is not yet available.


Abubakar, A. M., Abubakar, Y., & Itse, J. D. (2017). Students’ engagement in relation to academic performance. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 5-9.

Adeyemo, S. A. (2012). The relationship between effective classroom management and students’ academic achievement. European Journal of Educational Studies, 4(3), 367-381.

Adha, M., Yanzi, H., & Nurmalisa, Y. (2018). The improvement of student intelectual and participatory skill through project citizen model in civic education classroom. International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 3(1), 39-49.

Adoni, H., & Mane, S. (1984). Media and the social construction of reality: Toward an integration of theory and research. Communication Research, 11(3), 323-340.

Akbari, R., & Allvar, N. K. (2010). L2 teacher characteristics as predictors of students' academic achievement. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. 13(4), 1-22.

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

Arum, R. (2011). Improve relationships to improve student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(2), 8-13.

Asikhia, O. A. (2010). Students and teachers’ perception of the causes of poor academic performance in Ogun State secondary schools [Nigeria]: Implications for counselling for national development. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 229-242.

Aspelin, J. (2012). How do relationships influence student achievement? Understanding student performance from a general, social psychological standpoint. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(1), 41-56.

Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821-837.;2-Y

Banerjee, P. A. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to the poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1178441.

Benzo, R. M., Gremaud, A. L., Jerome, M., & Carr, L. J. (2016). Learning to stand: The acceptability and feasibility of introducing standing desks into college classrooms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 823.

Bernstein‐Yamashiro, B., & Noam, G. G. (2013). Teacher‐student relationships: A growing field of study. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013(137), 15-26.

Brau, B. (2020). Constructivism: The students' guide to learning design and research.

Bunge, M. (2000). Ten modes of individualism—none of which works—and their alternatives. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 30(3), 384-406.

Churcher, K. (2014). "Friending" Vygotsky: A social constructivist pedagogy of knowledge building through classroom social media use. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(1), 33-50.

Coldwell, J., Craig, A., Paterson, T., & Mustard, J. (2008). Online students: Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 6(1), 19-30.

DAĞ, N. (2016). Consideration on class communication and state of togetherness in class within the framework of constructivism. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(2), 315-328.

Deliens, T., Deforche, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Clarys, P. (2015). Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: A qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-9.

Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex constructivism: A theoretical model of complexity and cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485-498.

Furner, J. (2004). Conceptual analysis: A method for understanding information as evidence, and evidence as information. Archival Science, 4(3-4), 233-265.

Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers' use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 5(4), 49-63.

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109-114.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage publications.

Graber, C. R. (2009). Factors that are predictive of student achievement outcomes and an analysis of these factors in high-poverty schools versus low-poverty schools. Lindenwood University.

Guo, S., Cockburn-Wootten, C., & Munshi, D. (2014). Negotiating diversity: Fostering collaborative interpretations of case studies. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 169-182.

Gupta, M. L. (2004). Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 63-73.

Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-367.

Hazelrigg, L. E. (1986). Is there a choice between “Constructionism” and “Objectivism”?. Social Problems, 33(6), s1-s13.

Heimtun, B., & Morgan, N. (2012). Proposing paradigm peace: Mixed methods in feminist tourism research. Tourist Studies, 12(3), 287-304.

Kalina, C., & Powell, K. C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Kalpana, T. (2014). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27-29.

Kearney, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Constructivism as a referent in the design and development of a computer program using interactive digital video to enhance learning in physics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 64-79.

Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 1(1), 16.

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41.

Knoblauch, H., & Wilke, R. (2016). The common denominator: The reception and impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality. Human Studies, 39(1), 51-69.

Kukla, A. (2013). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. Routledge.

Lynch, M. E. (2019). The Sociology of Science and Social Constructivism. In The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology (pp. 220-229). Routledge.

Mackenzie, N. & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues In Educational Research, 16, 1-15.

Mahenthiran, S. & Rouse, P. (2000). The impact of group selection on student performance and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(6), 255-264.

Mamas, C., Daly, A. J., & Schaelli, G. H. (2019). Socially responsive classrooms for students with special educational needs and disabilities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100334.

McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184-207.

Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 325-344.

Omodan B. I. & Tsotetsi C. T. (2020). Decolonisation of knowledge construction in university classrooms: The place of social constructivism. Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa, 9(2), 183-204.

Omodan, B. I. & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2018). Student-teacher relationships as panacea for students' academic performance in Nigeria secondary schools: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9 (4), 82-101.

Pass, S. (2004). Parallel paths to constructivism: Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. IAP.

Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K., Kassean, H. K., Tsala, J. P. T., Sychareun, V., & Müller-Riemenschneider, F. (2015). Physical inactivity and associated factors among university students in 23 low-, middle-and high-income countries. International Journal of Public Health, 60(5), 539-549.

Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252-267.

Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395-411.

Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395-411.

Siebenaler, D. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 6-20.

Suliwa, Widodo, W., & Munasir. (2021). Influence of LKPD to facilitate cooperative group investigation in improving students’ science process skills. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 73-85.

Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 443-461.

Topor, D. R., Keane, S. P., Shelton, T. L., & Calkins, S. D. (2010). Parent involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(3), 183-197.

Turner J. C., Christensen A., Meyer D. K. (2009) Teachers' Beliefs about Student Learning and Motivation. In: Saha L. J., Dworkin A. G. (eds.) International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 21. Springer.

Van Hover, S., & Hicks, D. (2017). Social constructivism and student learning in social studies. The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research, 270-318.

Viyayanti, & Dwikoranto. (2021). Make a match techniques in cooperative learning: innovations to improve student learning outcomes, student learning activities and teacher performance. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 35-46.

Voghoei, S., Tonekaboni, N. H., Yazdansepas, D., & Arabnia, H. R. (2019, December). University online courses: Correlation between students' participation rate and academic performance. In 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) (pp. 772-777). IEEE.

Weaver, R. G., Webster, C. A., Beets, M. W., Brazendale, K., Chandler, J., Schisler, L., & Aziz, M. (2018). Initial outcomes of a participatory-based, competency-building approach to increasing physical education teachers’ physical activity promotion and students’ physical activity: A pilot study. Health Education & Behavior, 45(3), 359-370.

Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research: Thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1311-1323.

Zubiri-Esnaola, H., Vidu, A., Rios-Gonzalez, O., & Morla-Folch, T. (2020). Inclusivity, participation and collaboration: Learning in interactive groups. Educational Research, 62(2), 162-180.

How to Cite
Bunmi Isaiah Omodan. (2022). The Potency of Social Constructivism on Classroom Productivity in Universities. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 36-45.