The Validity of Concept Attainment With Multi Representation as an Alternative Learning Model to Improve Students' Mastery of Concepts and Scientific Consistency
Abstract
The concept attainment tutorial tool with multi representations still needs to be developed. The purpose of this study is to describe the validity of the model and the validity of concept attainment devices with multi representations as alternative learning models to improve students' mastery of concepts and scientific consistency. The development of this tutorial tool uses the design of Plomp which consists of preliminary study phase, prototype stage, and assessment phase. The limited test was conducted on students of the Surabaya Open University in the Basic Science Natural Sciences course (PDGK4103). Research data were collected by the validation method using the model validation sheet instrument and the device validation sheet. Data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that: (1) The concept of attainment model with multi representations developed is included in the valid criteria in terms of content validity and construct validity. (2) The multi-representation tutorial tool developed is included in the valid criteria. Based on the above it can be concluded that the concept of attainment with multi representations developed is valid and appropriate to be used to improve students' mastery of concepts and scientific consistency.
Downloads
References
Admoko, Endrias, N., & Yogi. (2017). Profil mahasiswa pemrogram matakuliah konsep dasar IPA di SD [Student profile of Natural Science Basic Program subjects in elementary school]. Citra Mandiri Adv.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Borich, G. D. (2011). Observation skills for effective teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., & Leonard, W. J. (1997). Solving physics problems with multiple representations. The Physics Teacher, 35(5), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344681
Dwikoranto, Madlazim, Erman. (2019). Project based laboratory learning as an alternative learning model to improve sciences process skills and creativity of physic teacher candidate. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012074
Dwikoranto, Setiani, R., Madlazim, & Erman, E. (2018). Validity of project based laboratory learning: An innovative physics laboratory learning to prepare sciences process skills and creativity of physics teacher candidate. In Z. Zheng & Z. Xi (Eds.) Atlantis Highlights in Engineering - Proceedings of International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018). (pp. 912–917). Atlantis Press. https:/doi.org/10.2991/icst-18.2018.184
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductor physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Homer, D., & Bowen-Jones, M. (2014). Oxford IB diploma programme: Physics course companion. Oxford University Press.
Kurnaz, M. A., & Arslan, A. S. (2014). Effectiveness of multiple representations for learning energy concept: Case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.269
Ministry of Education. (2006). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional Republik Indonesia standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah [Minister of Education Regulation No.22.2006 concerning content standards for primary and secondary education units] (No. 22.2006). Ministry of Education of Indonesia.
Murtono, Setiawan, A., Asmawi, Z., & Dadi, R. (2015). Profile of the consistency of representation and scientific consistency of prospective physics teachers on newton's law materials, business, and energy. Wahana Physics Education Journal UPI, 96-101.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2010). Force concept inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 20109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020109
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp and N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 89-101). SLO - Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp and N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 10-51). SLO - Netherlands Instrument for Curriculum Development.
Sari, A. P., Feranie, S., & Karim, S. (2015). Penerapan pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan multirepresentasi untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar dan konsistensi ilmiah berbasis multirepresentasi pada materi elastisitas. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.01208
Setyaningrum, E. E. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran interaktif dalam model pencapaian konsep untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2).
Setyowati, T., Surasmi, W. A., Widuroyekti, B., Sambada, D., Pramonoadi, Setiani, R., Dwikoranto, & Faqih, A. (2019). Tutorial model with student’s pictorial riddle based worksheet for practicing representation capabilities of prospective teacher candidate. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012128
Suhandi, A., & Wibowo, F. C. (2012). Pendekatan multirepresentasi dalam pembelajaran usaha-energi dan dampak terhadap pemahaman konsep mahasiswa. Jurnal pendidikan fisika Indonesia, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v8i1.1988
Sumardi, Y., Rumanta, M., Sapriati, A., Sukiniarti, Ratnaningsih, A., Iryani, K., Syulasmi, A., Safitri, H., Herawati, & Padiangan, P. (2008). Konsep dasar ilmu pengetahuan alam di sekolah dasar. Universitas Terbuka.
Sutopo, Sari, A. & Wartono, (2015). Penggunaan multi representasi untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa SMA pada materi hukum II Newton. In A. Widiyatmoko, A. V. Amalia, E. N. Savitri, & R. D. Hardianti (Eds.), Seminar Nasional IPA VI (pp. 270-280). CV. Swadaya.
Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita L., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). Validity of creative responsibility based learning: An innovative physics learning to prepare the generation of creative and responsibility. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 56-61 https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701025661
Taqwa, M. R. A., Zainuddin, A., & Riantoni, C. (2020). Multi representation approach to increase the students’ conceptual understanding of work and energy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032090
Tresnaningsih, S., Supardiono, Munasir, Dwikoranto, Pramonoadi, Setyowati, T., Sambada, D., & Setiani, R. (2019). Effectiveness concept attainment tutorial based multi representation of mastery concepts and scientific consistency college student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012073
Ulfarina, L. (2010). Penggunaan pendekatan multi representasi pada pembelajaran konsep gerak untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan memperkecil kuantitas miskonsepsi siswa SMP. [Master’s thesis, Indonesia University of Education]. UPI Repository. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/9671
Widianingtiyas, L., Siswoyo, S., & Bakri, F. (2015). Pengaruh pendekatan multi representasi dalam pembelajaran fisika terhadap kemampuan kognitif siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.01105
Zou, X. (2010). The use of multiple representation and visualization in student learning of introductory physics: An example from work and energy. [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University]. OhioLINK. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1488203158826859
Copyright (c) 2020 Studies in Learning and Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
