Integrated Twin Tower (ITT) Based Learning to Think (LTT) Model to Enhance Scientific Creativity and Spiritual of students in the Early Childhood Islamic Education Department
The Indonesian National Qualification Framework in higher education requires universities to develop a curriculum so that students have superior competence with a variety of skills that are appropriate to the needs of the 21st century in the field of enhancing creative thinking skills. Expectations about the importance of scientific and spiritual creativity of Students of Early Childhood Islamic Education department based on the above literature review contradict the results of preliminary studies by researchers. The results of preliminary studies that there are complex problems that must be resolved immediately, and learning innovation and development of lecture devices that are specifically designed to develop scientific and spiritual creativity of students in the Early Childhood Islamic Education Department in UINSA is very needed. An alternative solution to the above problems that are offered by researchers is to develop an Integrated Twin Tower-based Learn to Think (LTT) learning model to enhance the scientific and spiritual creativity of students in the Early Childhood Islamic Education Department. This model was developed by correcting the weaknesses of the LTT model and adding an Integrated Twin Tower in each syntax based on the literature review that has been done before. Integrated Twin Tower is an innovative idea that has been developed at The Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training of UINSA with the foundation of thinking that the learning process cannot be separated between the core scientific fields of study and the Islamic values.
ADB. (2014). Creative productivity index: Analysing creativity and innovation in Asia. A report by the economist intelligence unit for the Asian Development Bank August 2014. The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. and Asian Development Bank.
Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.
Dhir, T. (2014). Problem solving ability and science process skills as the influential factors of scientific creativity. International Journal of Research Pedagogy and Technology in Education Movement Sciences, 2(4), 11-17.
Eggen, P.D., & Kauchak, D.P. (2013). Educational psychology. New Jersey: Pearson.
Fauziah, C., Nuvitalia, D., & Saptaningrum, E. (2018). Model project based learning (PjBL) berbasis lesson study terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 125-132.
Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 43–50.
Greiff, S., Wustenberg, S., Csapo, B., Demetriou, A., Hautamaki, A., Graesser, A. C., & Martin, R. (2014). Domain-general problem solving skills and education in the 21st century. Educational Research Review, 13, 74–83.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assesment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. New York: Springer.
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.
Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C. & Meyer, W. (2013). Increasing student’s scientiﬁc creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21.
Kemdikbud. (2016). Salinan lampiran peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 22 tahun 2016 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Liu, S.C., & Lin, H.S. (2013). Primary teacher’s beliefs about scientific creativity in the classroom context. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1551-1567.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psichology. New Mecico. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mukhopadhyay, R. (2013). Measurement of creativity in physics: A brief review on related tools. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(5), 45-50.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Student’s skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V), PISA. Publishing: OECD.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.
Rotteram, K. (2014) Teaching, learning and creativity model for science. SSR, 95, 79-84.
Siswanto, J. (2018). Keefektifan pembelajaran fisika dengan pendekatan STEM untuk meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 133-137.
Slavin, R.E. (2011). Educational psikology, theori and practice. Boston: Pearson Education.
Stenberg, R.J. (2009). Academic intelligence is not enough WICS: An expanded model for effective practice in school and later in life. A Paper Commissioned for The Conference on Liberal Education and Effective Practice, Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise, March 12-13, 2009.
Suyidno, Dewantara, D., Nur, M., & Yuanita, L. (2017). Maximize student’s scientific process skill within creatively product design: creative responsibility based learning. Proceeding The 5th South East Asia Development Research (SEA-DR) International Conference. Banjarmasin, Indonesia, 3 Mei 2017.
Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Salam, A.M. (2020). Creative responsibility based learning: Kreatif pendidiknya, dahsyat peserta didiknya. Banjarmasin: ULM Press.
Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., Prahani, B. K., and Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of creative responsibility based teaching (CRBT) model on basic physics learning to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136-151.
Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, M., Sunarti, T., & Dwikoranto, D. (2019). Increasing students’ responsibility and scientific creativity through creative responsibility based learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya, 9(2), 178-188.
Torrance, E. P. (2013). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.
Yesil, R. (2013). The evaluation of responsibility education strategies of primary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2775- 2787.
Zakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-based laboratory practices in a science teacher training program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 173-183.
Authors who want to publish this journal must agree to the following conditions:
- The author grants the first Copyright to the journal Studies in Learning and Teaching with works that are simultaneously licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which allows others to share work with authorship recognition initial works and publications in this journal for non-commercial purposes.
- The author can make separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of the work. initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publishes and distributes Articles with a copyright notice to SiLeT under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 article license.