Students’ Responses toward Scientific Argumentation with ADI Learning Model to Physics Literacy: A Case of Indonesian Senior High School Students

  • Della Shinta Bestiantono Physics Education Program, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords: Scientific argumentation, ADI, RT-SAPL, Indonesian, Students

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore Indonesian students’ responses towards scientific argumentation with ADI learning model to physics literacy by using survey study. The sample included 100 Indonesian senior high school students (47% male and 53% female) who were studying at public school in East Java province. The Responses towards Scientific Argumentation ADI Learning Model to Physics Literacy (RT-SAPL) questionnaire was developed with Indonesian language and validated through an exploratory factor analysis of participants’ responses. For measuring the correlation among three dimensions of scale, the Pearson Correlation product moment was used. The findings indicated: the instrument used in this study had satisfactory validity and reliability. Meanwhile, the construct validities of the RT-SAPL were varying from .617 and .832 and extracting 70.655% of the variance with overall Cronbach’s alpha constant was .854. Moreover, the dimension of ADI learning model came in the first rank and followed by Scientific argumentation as well as the degree of responses towards scientific argumentation with ADI learning model to physics literacy. Finally, the findings have also indicated a significant relationship among factors of RT-SAPL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Doringin, F. (2017). https://pgsd.binus.ac.id/2017/08/08/kurikulumbaru-keterampilan-abad-21-dan-implementasinya/. Retrieved September 09 17, 2019, from https://pgsd.binus.ac.id .

Harrell, M. (2004). Using argument diagrams to improve critical thinking skills in introductory philosophy. Carnegie Mellon University Department of Philosophy, 3.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kemendikbud.

Kulsum, U., & S. E Nugroho. (2014, Agustus). Penerapan model pembelajaran cooperative problem solving untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan komunikasi ilmiah siswa pada mata pelajaran fisika. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 2.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001, June). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 63.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Mork, M. (2004, June). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 994-1020.

PISA. (2016). PISA 2015. [Online]. doi:Available at: www.oecd.org

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71, 465-472.

Suprapto, N. (2016). Student’s Attitude towards STEM education : Voice from Indonesian Junior High School. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue), 75-87.

Published
2020-04-13
How to Cite
Bestiantono, D. S. (2020). Students’ Responses toward Scientific Argumentation with ADI Learning Model to Physics Literacy: A Case of Indonesian Senior High School Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.18
Section
Articles